Activation of Infralimbic cortex neurons projecting to the nucleus accumbens shell suppresses discriminative stimulus-triggered relapse to cocaine seeking in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Cocaine addiction is marked by high relapse rates, often triggered by drug-associated cues. These cues can be conditioned stimuli (CSs), which occur after drug intake and are paired with drug effects, and discriminative stimuli (DSs), which signal drug availability, regardless of ongoing drug-seeking behaviour. While projections from the infralimbic cortex (IL) to the nucleus accumbens (NAc) shell are known to regulate CS-induced cocaine relapse, their role in DS-triggered relapse is not known. To investigate this, we examined how activating IL→NAc shell projections influences relapse driven by DSs and CSs during abstinence from intermittent cocaine use. Female Sprague-Dawley rats received viral-mediated gene expression of excitatory designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs in the IL. Rats then self-administered cocaine during 12 intermittent-access sessions (5-min cocaine ON/25-min cocaine OFF, 4h/day). A discrete light (DS+) signalled drug-available periods, while a different light (DS-) signalled drug non-availability. During each DS+ period, cocaine infusions were paired with a compound light-tone (CS+). Four weeks later, rats were tested for cue-induced cocaine seeking following response-independent presentation of DS+, CS+ or both. Immediately prior to testing, rats received intra-NAc shell clozapine N-oxide or aCSF to activate IL terminals. DS+ alone and DS+/CS+ combined triggered greater cocaine seeking than did the CS+. Activation of IL→NAc shell projections suppressed relapse behaviour in DS+ and DS+/CS+ conditions. These findings highlight the distinct and powerful influence of DSs on relapse and identify the IL→NAc shell circuit as a promising target for relapse prevention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".