Economische impactanalyse AMvB dierwaardigheid in de veehouderij ten behoeve van de internetconsultatie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mei 2024 heeft de Eerste Kamer het wetsvoorstel aangenomen dat voorziet in de vervanging van de in de Wet dieren bij amendement Vestering (35398, 23) doorgevoerde wijziging van artikel 2.1 van de Wet dieren.Het aanvullend amendement verplicht dat er binnen een jaar voor de sectoren melkveehouderij, pluimveehouderij, varkenshouderij en vleeskalverhouderij een algemene maatregel van bestuur (AMvB) komt, waarin wordt beschreven hoe een dierwaardige veehouderij er in 2040 uit moet zien.Van de in dit verband voorgenomen maatregelen zijn de verwachte kosten gekwantificeerd, zowel op bedrijfsniveau als voor de vier afzonderlijke veehouderijsectoren als geheel.Het investeringsbedrag dat hier in totaal tot 2040 mee gemoeid is ligt bij een 20% reductie van de omvang van de veestapel in de orde van grootte van 5,9 tot 8,4 mld.euro.De hieruit voortvloeiende extra jaarlijkse kosten (inclusief opbrengstderving, exclusief subsidies) variëren van 1,3 tot 2,1 mld.euro, overeenkomend met 52 tot 88 euro hogere jaarlijkse huishouduitgaven.Methodisch is ervoor gekozen om gebruik te maken van dezelfde rekenwijze zoals die standaard bij de analyse van de economische impact van andere dierenwelzijnsstandaarden wordt gebruikt.In May 2024, the Senate adopted the bill that provides for the replacement of the amendment to Article 2.1 of the Animals Act by amendment Vestering (35398, 23).The additional amendment requires that within a year there will be a an Statutory Order of Governmental Decree (AMvB) for the dairy, poultry, pigs and veal calves sectors, describing what animal-worthy livestock farming should look like in 2040.The expected costs of the measures envisaged in this context have been quantified, both at farm level and for the four individual livestock sectors as a whole.The total investment amount involved is in the order of 5.9 to 8.4bn.euros.The additional annual costs (including loss of net revenue, excluding subsidies) range from 1,3 to 2,1bn.euros, corresponding to 52 to 88 euros higher annual household expenditure.Methodologically, the choice was made to use the same calculation method as is standard in the analysis of the economic impact of other animal welfare standards.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".