MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411655528 · doi:10.1051/epjconf/202532901012

Unveiling New States in <sup>98</sup>Zr: Insights from <i>β</i>-decay and <i>γ-γ</i> Angular-Correlation Studies

2025· article· en· W4411655528 on OpenAlexaff
K.R. Mashtakov, P. E. Garrett, B. Olaizola, C. Andreoiu, G. C. Ball, P. C. Bender, V. Bildstein, A. Chester, D. S. Cross, H. Dawkins, G. A. Demand, A. Diaz-Varela, Guochu Deng, A. B. Garnsworthy, G. Hackman, B. Hadinia, A. T. Laffoley, M. Moukaddam, J. Park, Evan Peters, A. J. Radich, M. M. Rajabali, E. T. Rand, U. Rizwan, B. P. Singh, K. Starosta, C. E. Svensson, P. Voss, Z-M. Wang, J. Wood, S. W. Yates

Bibliographic record

VenueEPJ Web of Conferences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityTRIUMFSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsNuclear physicsAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The nuclear structure of the 98 Zr nucleus was studied through the β − decay of 98 Y g.s. at the TRIUMF-ISAC facility. The use of the 8π γ-ray spectrometer with its ancillary detectors SCEPTAR and PACES enabled γ-γ and γ-e − coincidence measurements as well as γ-γ angular correlations. The level spin assignments and transition mixing ratios obtained in this study were in good agreement with previous results. Furthermore, 12 previously unknown states in the low-energy region of 98 Zr were identified, including the 0 + 5 and 0 + 6 levels at 2418 and 2749 keV, respectively. The 2 + and I = 1 natures for multiple newly observed and previously known (but not firmly assigned) states have been established. Additionally, the previously assumed pure E 2 character of the 2 + 2 → 2 + 1 367.8-keV transition was confirmed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.501
Threshold uncertainty score0.602

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEPJ Web of ConferencesSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207