Bibliographic record
Abstract
As results of the rapid growth of urban population and its problems in last centuries, cities, and urban neighborhoods, as the primary level of interaction between people and cities, faced with different challenges and played a vital role.In this regard, a controversial issue among urban planners is that find out how the cities and its neighborhoods could bring prosperity to their inhabitants.In these matters, planning scholars try to achieve significant outcomes.This study aims to review the evolution of paradigms, theories, and approaches on neighborhood-based planning since the beginning of the twentieth century so far, lesson learn from the past and provide a multidimensional framework that helps to the creation of livable and prosperous communities.So first, with review literature, three significant waves of neighborhood planning identified.After that based on common characters of literature, five principles of prosperity at the local level including green infrastructure, enduring and resiliency, efficiency, justice -social interactions and livability, proposed in an integrated framework.Also, this framework provides the networks of interaction between places, people, activities, and environment and show the role and function neighborhoods to achieve urban prosperity as we saw in the past.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.997 | 0.979 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".