Bibliographic record
Abstract
This rule is based on the orders which have been mentioned in the custom, and jurists have quoted it in different ways.Although this rule has long been the subject of the Imamiyeh jurisprudence, it has been based on various principles of jurisprudence, such as possession of unclaimed things and mosque rulings and trade practices.Also, in the book of Revitalization and accessories, a sample of petrification is cited.The general provisions of the rule are that anyone has to prioritize the use of the main arguments with common places, such as roads, mosques, and endowments, as long as he has not abandoned or abandoned it for a long time, and that no one can disturb him.In addition, the legal provisions are the rules of viability and the restitution of property, and the provisions of the rule on imprisonment have the right to prioritize ownership, while the provisions of the reason rule are the priority for profit.Therefore, although the subject matter of the law is united with the subject matter of the viability rules, rehabilitation and diversion, if someone treats the financial or prospective material, if he has consistently pursued his interests, he has the right to make a profit in the sense of giving priority to him.In short, it is the source for the legal order to exploit the commons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.939 | 0.932 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".