MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411656598 · doi:10.51847/tmedxc3ewj

10.51847/TMeDXC3ewJ

2000· article· en· W4411656598 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJob performanceJob attitudeJob designJob rotationJob shadowJob analysisPersonnel psychologyJob characteristic theoryPsychologyJob satisfactionJob stressSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research investigates the effect of job characteristics on job involvement and job performance in masjed soleiman municipality staff.The research is applied in terms of its purpose and in terms of the method of collecting data is descriptive causal.The statistical population of the study consisted of all municipality employees of masjed soleiman.thesampling method in this research was random.Considering the limited community and morgan table, the sample size of 240 employees was considered.After distributing the 250 questionnaires were collected and analyzed.All analyzes performed using SPSS and smart PLS software.In this research to evaluate the motivational characteristics of a 5-item occupation, job diversification, job autonomy, job feedback, meaningfulness, and duty identity have been investigated.the results of the research showed that all five dimensions of job motivation have a significant effect on employee participation.also, the results showed that job involvement has a significant effect on the performance of the employees of the municipality of masjed soleiman.finally, research proposals and suggestions for future research are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9130.835

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knit→Same topicJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior→French-language works237,207→