Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the dimensions of philosophical mentality of principals with their leadership style.This descriptive study was correlational.The statistical population of this study was all male and female principals working in state schools of Bilehsuvar (Iran) city, which consisted of 100 people.According to Krejcie and Morgan table, a sample of 80 were selected randomly.To collect information, two questionnaires were used to measure the philosophical mentality of principals based on Smith's model with alpha coefficient of 0.73, and Hersey and Blancchard's Situational leadership style were used with alpha coefficient of 0.92.The research data after the collection were analyzed based on the research hypothesis and using the correlation analysis.The results of this study showed that, firstly, the variable of penetration has the highest weight in generating the canonical variable of the dimensions of philosophical subjectivity, and also the flexibility variable has the highest relation with the composite variable derived from dependent variables.Second, the weight of the common variance (canonical correlation squared) between these two categories of variables is approximately 42%, which is statistically significant with a value of F= 398/3, df= 12, P <0.0001.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.942 | 0.958 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it