Bibliographic record
Abstract
District Charsadda is a very important center of plant biodiversity in the central plain of Peshawar valley, Pakistan.The present study was carried out during 2015-2016 to investigate the ethno botanical profile of common weed flora present in district Charsadda, KP, Pakistan.The study revealed that there were 40 weed species belonging to 21 families.Among them, 25 weeds were annual herbs, 9 weeds were perennial herbs, three were annual grass, one was a climbing herb, one was a parasitic weed, and one was rhizomatic grass.The dominant families were Asteraceae, Fabaceae and Poaceae having 5 species (12.5 %) each followed by Ranunculaceae with 3 species (7.5 %).Plants were systematically arranged into botanical names, local names, families, habits, habitats, used parts, flowering periods, localities, and ethno botanical uses.The main aim of the study is the documentation and collection of ethno botanical information of the weed flora growing in the area.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.998 | 0.973 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".