Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article tries to study the subject of religious iconography of the Holy Prophet (pbuh) in print.The Qajar period and the visual and manifestation of this printed book of prints.However, this research faces two questions: in the design of the icons of the Prophet (PBUH), what are the special and unique features?Can the nature and design of the designs used in the simulation of the same hierarchy be the same in this regard, this research tries to examine a number of religious iconography of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) during the period of Qajarra during the period of the Qajarra period, with the historical theme and descriptive analytical method and using the collection of documents and documents.The results obtained from the semiotics of the printed edition in this area indicate that the signs of the archaeological imprint of the printed edition of the Qajar period are continuing the style and style of coffee house paintings that have been repeated in another manner.The features include: the type of payment of faces, the presence of holy shrines, tidbits, and the manner of placing personality in place of painting, paying attention to the principles of naturalism and later on in the design of works that today have become a well-known face of religious iconography.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.970 | 0.964 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".