Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate resting and standing behavior and stall usage by cows for resting and standing and effect of environmental temperatures on these behaviors in free stall housing system.In a free stall commercial dairy farm in Golestan province, 60 lactating cows of two high producing or low producing groups were filmed for 20 continues 24 h periods in two different season (hot and cold).Data for standing in stalls, resting in stalls, standing in alleys, perching in stalls and resting in alleys were collected using 30 minutes' interval scanning the video records.Data were analyzed in a 22 factorial experiment using general linier model.Counteraction effects of seasongroup on behavioral variables were not significant.Also, there were no differences between high producing and low producing cows in resting or standing behaviors.Season has a considerable effect on resting behavior and stall usage.Cows rest more and spend more time resting in stalls in colder season than in hot season, and they spend more time resting in alleys in hot season (p<0.05).Based on these results, it can be concluded that many of the standards used for construction of this free stall barn are probably inadequate for care of animals and needs total revision based on cow natural behaviors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.998 | 0.996 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".