MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411656669 · doi:10.51847/zxh579pfgs

10.51847/zXh579PfgS

2000· article· en· W4411656669 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoyaltyBusinessQuality (philosophy)Marketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current research aims to analyze effect of indices of quality of relationships on customers' loyalty in Pishraft Darman Company.The statistical population of this study includes all customers in Pishraft Darman Company in 2017 and 150 customers were chosen as statistical sample using unlimited population sampling technique.In this survey, indices of quality of relations (trust commitment and satisfaction) were considered as independent variables and customers' loyalty was assumed as dependent variable.The current research is included in applied studies and it is deemed as a descriptive survey in terms of method.The librarian method was utilized in this study for data collection.The data collection technique was of librarian type and questionnaire was adapted as a tool for data collection.All hypotheses were analyzed at significance level (p<0.01) for which SPSS software (v.20) was employed for execution of all statistical operations.The research findings indicated that the indices of relationship quality might affect customers' loyalty in Pishraft Darman Company.Trust, commitment, and satisfaction affect the relationship in loyalty of customers in Pishraft Darman Company.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9470.926

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceFrench-language works237,207