Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current research aims to analyze effect of indices of quality of relationships on customers' loyalty in Pishraft Darman Company.The statistical population of this study includes all customers in Pishraft Darman Company in 2017 and 150 customers were chosen as statistical sample using unlimited population sampling technique.In this survey, indices of quality of relations (trust commitment and satisfaction) were considered as independent variables and customers' loyalty was assumed as dependent variable.The current research is included in applied studies and it is deemed as a descriptive survey in terms of method.The librarian method was utilized in this study for data collection.The data collection technique was of librarian type and questionnaire was adapted as a tool for data collection.All hypotheses were analyzed at significance level (p<0.01) for which SPSS software (v.20) was employed for execution of all statistical operations.The research findings indicated that the indices of relationship quality might affect customers' loyalty in Pishraft Darman Company.Trust, commitment, and satisfaction affect the relationship in loyalty of customers in Pishraft Darman Company.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.991 | 0.986 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it