MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411656673 · doi:10.51847/tsakwyqnlx

10.51847/tsakwYQNLX

2000· article· en· W4411656673 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban and Rural Development Challenges
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
KeywordsProperty (philosophy)BusinessFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The deplorable condition of neighbourhood facilities in Bauchi metropolis persists, while the initiative aimed at raising local revenue to maintain and redevelop the local facilities has not been implemented.Property rating is one of the most stable source of local revenue, which if harnessing can finance the provision and maintenance of community infrastructures.This study has examined the existing condition of neighbourhood facilities and evaluated the most significant factors that militated against the implementation of property rating.The study has collected quantitative data, and used SPSS for reliability and exploratory factor analysis; and applied Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) with Analysis of Moment Structure (AMOS) for the analysis of the measurements and the structural models.The results showed that 'Over-Reliance on Crude Oil Revenue' and 'Poor Taxation System' are the most important factors hindering the implementation of property rating.And that the 'Lack of Political Will' is a factor that remarkably influenced the condition of the neighbourhood facilities in the study area.In conclusion the study has proposed Land area-based assessment for rating valuation, using Google Earth/Map for area measurement.The proposed framework was envisaged to be cost-effective in rating valuation.It was recommended that the government should diversify revenue sources from oil-based to harness all the avenues like property rating at the municipal level.Future studies should find out, apart from 'Over Reliance on Crude Oil Revenue' and 'Poor Taxation System', whether some other factors do militate against the implementation of the property rating in the study area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9390.931

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicUrban and Rural Development ChallengesFrench-language works237,207