MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411656684 · doi:10.51847/pg0jx2n8zz

10.51847/pg0JX2n8ZZ

2000· article· en· W4411656684 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRisk perceptionProduct (mathematics)BusinessMarketingQuality (philosophy)PerceptionAdvertisingPsychologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study aimed to investigate effects of customer perception of product risk, price and quality on national brand attitude.The research model consisted of variables such as the product quality perception (PQP), perceived risk (PR), price value perception (PVP), behavioral characteristics (BC), and national brand attitude (NBA).The research method was applied in terms of objective, and correlational according to its method.Using the questionnaire and survey method, the required data was randomly distributed among customers of Refah Chain Stores Co. in Mashhad City and 310 acceptable samples were collected.Data was analyzed using SPSS18 software.Relationships of variables and factors were confirmed using the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and PLS modeling technique via PLS2 Smart software.Research results confirmed a relationship between the product quality perception and national brand attitude.There was a significant relationship between the perceived risk and national brand attitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9520.928

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicConsumer Perception and Purchasing BehaviorFrench-language works237,207