Bibliographic record
Abstract
Weight stigma is present in the world.Many obese people experience bias and discrimination at home, in community, at school, at work, etc.The consequences are very severe, because the psychological well-being of obese people is influenced by negative attitudes toward them.The main aim of the study is exploring anti-fat attitudes and fat phobia of students of Psychology study program (bachelor degree) of the Faculty of Educational Sciences at the University of "Luigj Gurakuqi" of Shkoder in Albania and exploring the correlation between their anti-fat attitudes and fat phobia.In the study, 124 students of Psychology study program (bachelor degree) were participated.The measuring instruments were: a) Anti-fat Attitudes Questionnaire (AFA), and b) Fat Phobia Scale.The paper concluded that the students of Psychology study program have obesity bias.They have not a high level of fat phobia.For the students of Psychology study program (bachelor degree), the improvement of their attitudes toward anti-fat and the improvement of their attitudes regarding obesity are cnecessary.This will, in the future, impact the quality of services for people.Other studies should be made in order to discover why the students have such attitudes toward obesity and to get the needed strategies in order to improve students' attitudes toward obesity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.976 | 0.966 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".