MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411656717 · doi:10.51847/54rt292m0x

10.51847/54rt292M0X

2000· article· en· W4411656717 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGroundwater and Watershed Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNatural (archaeology)GroundwaterEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)GeographyGeologyGeotechnical engineeringArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water has many different physical characteristics as color, turbidity, TDS, etc. on the other hand, chemical characteristics of water as alkalinity, acidity and hardness can effect on its quality.Physicochemical characteristic observation of groundwater resources as actual sources, based on chemical analysis of dry and wet period of 2016 and transferred to GIS software and analysis in quality observation is conventional in such researches.In this research physicochemical parameters for 16 wells from 16 villages have been experienced.The parameters were: TDS, Cl, SO4, Nitrate and Ca.Finally, GIS map have been compared with geological and agricultural maps to find the result of high concentration of some parameters.It has been received from results that some problems as turbidity is natural but some other as Nitrate has anthropogenic source.For either kinds of problems, solutions as cap on wells or cementation are suggested.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9990.997

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.156
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicGroundwater and Watershed AnalysisFrench-language works237,207