Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present research examines policies of corporate social responsibility and the price image on consumer responses by mediating brand personality in the food retailers' market, which collects various brands alongside each other.In the research, the purpose of customer response is the satisfaction of customer from brand of retail, consequently satisfaction of trust and, consequently, the trust in creating the attitude and intention of buying in the future.The present study is descriptive-correlative in terms of nature and it is a survey study in terms of method.The statistical population consisted of 384 food buyers from the hypermarket and Shahrvand and refah stores, chain store in the north, east and west of Tehran.With the probability of 0.95, according to the results obtained from the path coefficient (0.49), the corporate social responsibility has a significant impact on brand personality.Based on the path coefficient (0.20), the mental image has a significant impact on brand personality traits, including complexity, adaptability, and palatability.According to the results obtained from the path coefficient (0.18), corporate social responsibility has a significant impact on customer satisfaction.The path coefficient (0.44) indicates that customer satisfaction has a significant impact on trust.According to the path coefficient (0.36), trust had a significant impact on customer attitude toward retail brand.The path coefficient (0.26) also showed that brand personality has a significant impact on brand satisfaction.Path coefficient (0.32) also showed that the attitude has a significant impact on purchase intention in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.991 | 0.990 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".