Bibliographic record
Abstract
Political interaction of members of the new middle class in Iran in recent years has lacked a cohesive and unilateral approach and therefore, its analysis needs a precise typology.Structural dependence of the new middle class on the government and bureaucratic structure of the state administration has had important role in giving direction to political interactions of this social strata.Undoubtedly, lack of independence of the new middle class from the structure of the political power in Iran has not been equivalent to their relentless support of official policies of the government.The new middle class in Iran is often the critic of the official policy of the government, and on the other hand, it plays a major role in implementing these policies as a bachelor force in the political system and thus cannot resolve this fundamental conflict in its relationship with the Islamic Republic of Iran.Due to modern knowledge and expertise, this social class has the potential to advance the process of political development in the country and should have a more effective role in the process of political modernization in Iran.In addition, with the expansion of urbanization and increased university education, the number of members of this category has been added.And has become the most important social class in Iran's political transformation.The new middle class in Ahmadinejad suffered from inactivity and weakened its central role in the country's political transformations, and its social and political power fell sharply.Ahmadinejad's attention was drawn to the low classes of society, and especially the villagers, with his disregard for this important social class.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.945 | 0.943 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".