MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411656809 · doi:10.51847/5mib1gqzjm

10.51847/5MIB1GqzJM

2000· article· en· W4411656809 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Critical Thinking Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSelf-esteemPragmaticsPsychologySocial psychologyMathematics educationDevelopmental psychologyLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study is aimed at investigating the effectiveness of teaching language functions via role play in enhancing second-grade high school female students' self-esteem in society in Region 2 of Yazd Province.In terms of objective, the study is considered as a type of applied research study, with a quasiexperimental and pretest-posttest design.The population of the study comprises all the high school female students in Region 2 of Yazd Province (2880 students).In order to glean the data, the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory (CSEI) was used which contained 58 items, describing the feelings, beliefs and responses of the participants.The participants were asked to fill out the inventory once before and once after the treatment.The treatment, which was teaching language functions via role play, was conducted for 10 sessions.As such, 10 scenarios were made by the researcher, each focusing on a specific speech act of language, for example, request or apology.The results of the covariance analysis revealed that teaching language functions via role play had a significant effect on enhancing the students' self-esteem in society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9580.928

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicEducation and Critical Thinking DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207