MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411656831 · doi:10.51847/ieuodesi7j

10.51847/IeuoDEsI7J

2000· article· en· W4411656831 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicInternational Maritime Law Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAstrobiologyEnvironmental scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High seas belong to all humanity.As a result it is not under qualification of any government and is free.International navigation and commerce also with the use of this principle is developing.This case is of basic importance especially for international commerce and trade.So any interference and applying prohibition is out of international rules.The owner of that flag state could stop and investigate every ship and provided that other governments have reasonable reasons to suspect a ship and those reasons to be in a way that which worth to stop and enter the ship is feasible.But if it becomes clear after investigation of the ship that it was unreasonable to suspect the ship, this issue would be pursuable in the international courts or the government which owns the flag state could retaliate with governmental ships which entered the ship possessing the flag that is harmful for international sailing totally.The flag state, has exclusive qualifications over the ship, its cargo and people.But there are some exceptions to the flag state rule.Right of visiting and searching martial ships in high seas in order to perform rules of international laws when it has acceptable reasons which a (non warship and non-governmental) has committed bellow actions, could be stopped and investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9600.950

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicInternational Maritime Law IssuesFrench-language works237,207