Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Electroslag remelting (ESR) and homogenization processes influence and decrease the segregation of alloying elements in steels considerably.The objective of this study was to examine the effects of homogenizing on the strength and ductility of low-alloy steel and then to compare the obtained properties with the electroslag remelted condition.To achieve this, a set of the primary ingots were melted and cast using an induction furnace and then electroslag were remelted.The second sets of ingots were homogenized at 1200°C instead of ESR processing subsequently after casting.All of the samples were analyzed with elemental analysis and x-ray diffraction after metallography.The evaluation of mechanical properties including tensile test, impact test, and microhardness measurements were carried out on both sets of the samples.It was observed that the homogenization process has more influence on improving strength and ductility of steel in comparison with the ESR process.Finally, it has been shown that reduction of segregation, the stability of retained austenite, and reduction of the thickness of bainitic ferrite sheaves could be achieved in homogenized samples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.872 | 0.837 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".