MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411656856 · doi:10.51847/hfd3qmu5pc

10.51847/HFd3Qmu5PC

2000· article· en· W4411656856 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining Techniques and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKey (lock)Capital investmentInvestment (military)Capital (architecture)BusinessState (computer science)Industrial organizationEnvironmental economicsNatural resource economicsFinanceComputer scienceEconomicsComputer securityGeographyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Semnan With Enjoyment From Potential Of Industrial Agriculture And Tourism a door the face Regulation Strategies Appropriate Economic The Be From Capacities Legal Creation Goods a door Direction Attraction Capital Of Internal And ForeignPlay Role Are.But This Important Up to Ever Result Section Not Is Therefore, a door This Research With Goal Check Obstacles And Factors Key Success a door Capital Share State With Aytfadh From Opinion Polls Experts And Experts State With Use From Soft Software spss And hierarchical analysis Sent Is Results Show The The a door Among Obstacles Capital Share Factor Government the most impact And Factor Economic, Common Legal And Factors Cultural a door Location Of next one The have .Also, a door Finally, With Sum Category Comments Experts And Experts And Study Records And Literature Way Business Attraction Capital With Emphasis On Factors ID Goods Voted Sent Is.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9680.961

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.152
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicMining Techniques and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207