Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examined the role of the judiciary in democracy consolidation in Nigeria (under the Buhari administration).Hence the general objective of the study was to examine the role of the judiciary in democracy consolidation in Nigeria, under the Buhari administration.The twin research questions were accordingly as follows: how has the judiciary fared in the area of contributions to democracy consolidation and what role must the judiciary play in engendering democracy consolidation in Nigeria under the Buhari dispensation?The study found that the role of the judiciary in democracy consolidation in Nigeria, particularly under the Buhari administration could not be described as unassailable.It was highlighted in the work that the checks and balances inherent in the executive-legislature-judiciary relations in a democracy, must not be done with impunity by the personnel of any of the three organs of government.And so let it be with the arrest, detention and trial of judges in the course of democracy consolidation in Nigeria, under the Buhari administration, the study concludes.But let no judge be arrested again.In other words, let no judge do again what may precipitate the arrest of a judge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.993 | 0.980 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".