Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present age is called the "age of communications" .In other words , because of the existence and application of mass media whose influence and effects are increasing ,they have developed a new form and have overshadowed the developments within the human societies.As a part of the new social structure and one of the comprehensive systems available to all , the media play a very critical and important role in the economic, social-cultural and political arenas.This research aims to investigate the role the media play in expanding the discourse on the human rights.The mass media as information highways and as effective communication means on the public opinion and on the civil society watchdog ,plays an important role in informing people ,strengthening the social cultural-thinking basis and expanding the human rights discourse and etc…. .They are of the most important leverages for education , advertisement and culture building affairs .they also make public opinion and are components in creating civilization.This research is of descriptive-analytical type.Analyzing the research concepts and theories reveal, mass media , despite future challenges through adopting different communication policies ,are believed to have a strategic role in bolstering and expanding the discourse on the human rights as well as on democracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.962 | 0.956 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".