MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411656963 · doi:10.51847/y1giftz2ho

10.51847/Y1Giftz2HO

2000· article· en· W4411656963 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStigma (botany)Perspective (graphical)PsychologyQuality of life (healthcare)Social psychologyDevelopmental psychologyComputer sciencePsychiatryPsychotherapistArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infertility as a crisis in marital life, has psychosocial consequences for the individual.The concept of life and interpersonal relationships vary from infertility.This study aims at predicting quality of life based on time perspective and perceived stigma in infertile women.The research method is correlation.The statistical population of the study consisted of all women infertility who visited Infertility Center located in Shahid Akbar Abadi Hospital in Tehran to receive infertility treatments during winter of 2015 until the sample size was completed.From this statistics, 147 people were selected using non-random sampling.The collected data were analyzed using Pearson correlation and structural model.The results showed that the time perspective predicts the quality of life of the infertile patients positively and significantly, as well as the perceived stigma does this negatively and significantly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)1.0000.998

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicPsychological and Temporal Perspectives ResearchFrench-language works237,207