Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study is premised on the viewpoint that the national question is critically interwoven with every other developmental issue in the Nigerian nation-state.It argued that development is either sustainable or it remains ephemeral.We hypothesize that the crucial factor which may most consummately deter the phenomenon of ephemeral development is the human capital element.Therefore, we pose the following questions: to what extent has human capital development been embedded in the current attempts at answering the national question in Nigeria?How can human capital development successfully contribute to the provision of answers to the national question in Nigeria?As we interrogate the surrounding issues to the two questions therefore, we intend to be proffering solutions to the nagging national question in Nigeria.It is strongly suggested in this study that when the national question in Nigeria is being profoundly addressed, sustainable development will invariably begin to appear realizable.Hence, the general objective of the study is to examine the relationship among human capital development, the national question and sustainable development in Nigeria.The specific objectives are to (i) establish a relationship between human capital development and solutions to the national question in Nigeria (ii) examine the relationship between the national question in Nigeria and sustainable national development and (iii) make recommendations on how human capital development can meaningfully contribute to the national question's answers in Nigeria.The theoretical framework of the study is the human capital theoretical framework.The study's methodology is logical argumentation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.932 | 0.903 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".