MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411666642 · doi:10.34190/eccws.24.1.3333

Cyber Defence Trainer for Marine Integrated Platform Management Systems

2025· article· en· W4411666642 on OpenAlexaff
Brian Lachine, Scott Knight

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Strategy and Technology
Canadian institutionsRoyal Canadian NavyRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrainerSystems engineeringComputer scienceBusinessEngineeringComputer securityProcess managementOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modern civilian and military marine vessels employ integrated platform management systems to monitor and control various different operational ship systems such has engine control, navigation and potentially weapon systems. These platform management systems consist of information and operational technology (IT/OT) environments that integrate commercial operating systems, TCP/IP based protocols and supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems in order to monitor and control marine cyber physical systems. This integration of technologies introduces threat vectors as well as unique operational, safety and potentially environmental impacts for marine vessels. Ships’ crews do not always have security monitoring capabilities and trained security staff who understand the various onboard systems to the extent they could detect a cyber attack. Furthermore, there is a lack of training environments that could be used to educate marine cyber operators. The aim of this research is to build an environment based on effective cyber training techniques to enable the education of marine cyber operators in defensive cyber operations. The environment in this context is a defensive cyber security trainer that enables students to analyse network traffic in order to detect attacks against any ship systems, including cyber physical systems. Effective training techniques refers to the pedagogical recommendations for successful cyber education and effective gamified design. Educating marine cyber operators how to detect attacks on marine IT/OT environments within an integrated platform management system will enable better protection from cyber attack against marine vessels. To accomplish this aim, defensive cyber trainer was developed that consisted of three key components. The first was a Capture the Flag (CTF) framework. The second was a server that included the emulation and simulation of key ship integrated platform management system components within a virtualized environment. Third, were open source and customized plugins used to analyse traffic in our virtualized ship and the inclusion of three different kill chains based on real attacker tactics, techniques and procedures (TTPs). This defensive cyber trainer was validated against research methodologies for effective gamified environment design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Conference on Cyber Warfare and SecuritySame topicMilitary Strategy and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207