MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

New Optimum solutions of The Time-Fractional Fitzhugh-Nagumo Equations

2025· article· en· W4411668151 on OpenAlex
T. Alzkari, Adil Khan, Mehreen Fiza, Hakeem Ullah, Aasim Ullah Jan, Ali Akgül, Ahmed S. Hendy, Ilyas Khan, A. B. Albidah, Wei Sin Koh

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Analysis and Applications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFractional Differential Equations Solutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMajmaah University
KeywordsMathematicsApplied mathematicsCalculus (dental)MedicineOrthodontics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose and objective of the present work are to show the reliability and effectiveness of the newly developed semi-numerical method, i-e, the Optimal Auxiliary Function method OAFM, by solving the fractional problems of Fitzhugh-Nagumo. We have developed OAFM mathematical formulations for nonlinear partial differential equations PDEs. The implementation of the OAFM achieves a fast serial convergence solution. The analysis shows that the proposed method has a simplified implementation and needless computational work, is extremely accurate, and converges rapidly. Tables were constructed to compare the numerical results with the problems' exact solutions to see the errors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.476

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it