AI-Based Classification of Pediatric Breath Sounds: Toward a Tool for Early Respiratory Screening
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Context: Respiratory morbidity is a leading cause of children’s consultations with general practitioners. Auscultation, the act of listening to breath sounds, is a crucial diagnostic method for respiratory system diseases. Problem: Parents and caregivers often lack the necessary knowledge and experience to identify subtle differences in children’s breath sounds. Furthermore, obtaining reliable feedback from young children about their physical condition is challenging. Methods: The use of a human–artificial intelligence (AI) tool is an essential component for screening and monitoring young children’s respiratory diseases. Using clinical data to design and validate the proposed approaches, we propose novel methods for recognizing and classifying children’s breath sounds. Different breath sound signals were analyzed in the time domain, frequency domain, and using spectrogram representations. Breath sound detection and segmentation were performed using digital signal processing techniques. Multiple features—including Mel–Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs), Linear Prediction Coefficients (LPCs), Linear Prediction Cepstral Coefficients (LPCCs), spectral entropy, and Dynamic Linear Prediction Coefficients (DLPCs)—were extracted to capture both time and frequency characteristics. These features were then fed into various classifiers, including K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), artificial neural networks (ANNs), hidden Markov models (HMMs), logistic regression, and decision trees, for recognition and classification. Main Findings: Experimental results from across 120 infants and preschoolers (2 months to 6 years) with respiratory disease (30 asthma, 30 croup, 30 pneumonia, and 30 normal) verified the performance of the proposed approaches. Conclusions: The proposed AI system provides a real-time diagnostic platform to improve clinical respiratory management and outcomes in young children, thereby reducing healthcare costs. Future work exploring additional respiratory diseases is warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".