MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411679392 · doi:10.1016/j.est.2025.117437

Effect of fin properties and positioning on phase change material (PCM) thermal behavior: A numerical study

2025· article· en· W4411679392 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Faroogh Garoosi, Apostolos Kantzas

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Energy Storage · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Change Materials Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPowerMitacsAlberta InnovatesPetroleum Technology Research CentreConocoPhillipsEnergi SimulationCommission Géologique du CanadaAlberta Energy Regulator
KeywordsPhase-change materialFinPhase changeMaterials scienceThermalThermodynamicsMechanicsPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents a comprehensive numerical investigation into the melting behavior of a Phase Change Material (PCM), specifically Lauric Acid, within latent thermal energy storage systems . To accomplish this, the Enthalpy-based method was employed to model the phase change process , ensuring accurate tracking of the solid-liquid interface and latent heat effects. To enhance numerical stability and accuracy, the convection terms in the momentum and energy equations were discretized using a third-order TVD flux-limiter scheme, while the pressure-velocity coupling was managed via the hybrid unsteady PISOR algorithm. Following extensive validation, the code was used to systematically study the effects of key design parameters, including the position and material of conductive fins and the configuration of embedded heated pipes. The results revealed that placing a fin at the lower portion of the heated wall significantly accelerates the melting process by enhancing buoyancy-driven convection and eliminating heat-trapping zones. Among the fin materials examined, Copper exhibited the highest thermal performance, followed closely by iron, while Nichrome demonstrated poor heat transfer characteristics due to its low conductivity. The simulations also showed that Rayleigh-Bénard convection plays a critical role in shaping the solid-liquid interface, resulting in wavy interfacial patterns and oscillatory Nusselt number behavior, whereas conduction-dominated regions exhibited thicker, slower-evolving interfaces due to limited convective motion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Energy StorageSame topicPhase Change Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207