MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411680800 · doi:10.1080/00207721.2025.2521014

Data-based adaptive second-order terminal sliding mode predictive control for nonlinear SISO systems with discrete-time dynamics

2025· article· en· W4411680800 on OpenAlexaff
Wenqi Xu, Xiaokun Liu, Xiaoping Liu, Tong Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Systems Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemSliding mode controlModel predictive controlTerminal (telecommunication)Terminal sliding modeMode (computer interface)Control (management)Computer scienceDynamics (music)Discrete time and continuous timeAdaptive controlMathematicsPhysicsArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we focus on the formulation of a novel control scheme for nonlinear discrete-time systems without the usage of model information, which integrates the terminal sliding mode control technique with model predictive control strategy. To deal with the disturbances the delay estimate method is employed. Moreover, the second-order sliding function is used to reduce the chattering phenomenon. Based upon the technique of partial form dynamic linearisation (PFDL), the proposed control algorithm is achieved. Moreover, with the aid of predictive control, the performance is further improved. The boundedness with respect to the sliding function and tracking error are proved via rigorous algebraic analysis. Finally, by providing an numerical simulation example and a practical simulation example of steam-water heat exchanger, the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is validated. Moreover, the control performance is further improved by combining model predictive control with the proposed algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Systems ScienceSame topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207