MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411680963 · doi:10.1177/10711007251341313

Midterm Survivorship of 106 Infinity Total Ankle Replacements: A Case Series From 2 Non-designer UK Centers

2025· article· en· W4411680963 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mark Dahill, Milosz Kostusiak, Michael Dean, Adrian Hughes, Rajesh Kakwani, An Murty, David Townshend, Ian Sharpe

Bibliographic record

VenueFoot & Ankle International · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFoot and Ankle Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurvivorship curveAnkle replacementSurgeryAnkleRadiographyProspective cohort studyDeformityPhysical therapyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The Infinity Total Ankle System is the total ankle replacement (TAR) with market leading share in the United Kingdom and has been implanted in patients since 2014. We report the longest prospective series of Infinity TAR, with mean 8-year survivorship data from 2 nondesigner centers in the United Kingdom. This is a dual-center, prospective, observational study. The primary aims were to assess survivorship and complications of the Infinity TAR. The secondary aims were to assess functional and radiologic outcomes. Methods: A total of 102 patients, comprising 106 primary TARs, were recruited into the study. Revision TAR and conversion from ankle arthrodesis were excluded from the study. Survivorship, complication, and patient-reported outcome measure score data were collected prospectively, during preoperative and annual, postoperative appointments. Plain weightbearing radiographs were assessed by 2 nonmasked authors for Canadian Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (COFAS) grade, coronal and sagittal deformity, and formation of periimplant lucencies. Results: Mean follow-up time was 98 months (range 83-113). Four patients were lost to follow-up, and 12 patients died. Twelve patients underwent secondary surgeries: 8 revision TAR and 4 nonrevision reoperations. The current survivorship of the remaining 90 patients is 91.1% (95% CI, 83.0%-95.4%). Fifteen patients (14%) had complications of surgery. The most common reason for revision surgery was unexplained pain (5 of 8 patients). Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire scores improved from 60 to 22 ( P < .01). EQ-5D-5L scores improved from 0.420 to 0.696 ( P < .01). The revision rate for this series is 9% at 8 years with a proven deep infection rate of 1%. Lucencies (35% of patients) were mostly asymptomatic. Conclusion: This prospective series of 106 modern fixed-bearing TAR shows an 8-year survivorship of 91%. The fixed-bearing Infinity TAR appears to be a safe, effective intervention in the treatment of end-stage ankle osteoarthritis and gives significant improvement in disease-specific and general health status outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFoot & Ankle InternationalSame topicFoot and Ankle SurgeryFrench-language works237,207