MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411685691 · doi:10.63149/j.pedint.50

Prescribir películas para entender el tabú del incesto

2025· article· es· W4411685691 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatría Integral · 2025
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCinema History and Criticism
Canadian institutionsChild, Adolescent and Family Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El tabú universal del incesto en la historia El término incesto proviene del latín incestus, que significa “no casto”, y define a esas relaciones o encuentros sexuales entre individuos cuya línea de consanguineidad es muy cercana dentro de los grados en que está prohibido el matrimonio, tal como las relaciones entre madres o padres con sus hijos, encuentros íntimos entre hermanos, y otros. El incesto no se limita al coito; puede abarcar un espectro de conductas sexuales inapropiadas entre miembros de la familia, incluyendo tocamientos, masturbación mutua o incluso la instrumentalización sexual de menores. Si bien el incesto puede ocurrir en cualquier tipo de familia, existen ciertos factores de riesgo asociados, como antecedentes de violencia familiar, aislamiento social, abuso de sustancias, problemas de salud mental no tratados y dinámicas familiares disfuncionales con roles parentales débiles o confusos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it