MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411686466 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453567

Variable stars in Local Group galaxies

2025· article· en· W4411686466 on OpenAlexaff
M. Monelli, A. M. Piersimoni, C. E. Martínez-Vázquez, S. Cassisi, P. B. Stetson, M. Marconi, P. J. Pérez-García, G. Bono, M. Dall’Ora, G. Fiorentino, Carme Gallart, M. Marengo

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Architectural Studies
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersMinistero dell'Università e della RicercaIstituto Nazionale di AstrofisicaMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónEuropean CommissionDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftGemini ObservatoryMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades“la Caixa” Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsVariable starLocal GroupGalaxyAstronomyStarsGroup (periodic table)Variable (mathematics)Milky Way

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims. Pulsating variable stars are invaluable tracers for reconstructing the star formation history and chemical evolution of their host galaxies. In this work, we explore the variable star population of Leo II, a distant dwarf spheroidal satellite of the Milky Way. Methods. We analyse an extensive dataset of ground-based B V R I time-series photometry spanning over 35 years. By examining the properties of RR Lyrae stars, we constrain the early chemical enrichment and spatial variation within Leo II. Additionally, we investigate the anomalous Cepheids in order to connect their characteristics with the galaxy’s prolonged star formation history, as revealed by deep HST/WFC3 colour–magnitude diagrams. Results. We identified and characterised 175 variable stars, with all but one associated with Leo II. Our work includes the discovery of 25 new RR Lyrae stars and two new anomalous Cepheids. Moreover, we reclassified V88 as a BL Her variable star. By employing multiple independent methods, including metallicity-luminosity relations for RR Lyrae stars and period–luminosity and period–Wesenheit relations for both RR Lyrae and anomalous Cepheids, we derived a true distance modulus of ( m − M ) 0 = 21.60 ± 0.03 mag, corresponding to 209 ± 4 kpc. Furthermore, we discuss potential formation scenarios for anomalous Cepheids and suggest that, despite the extended star formation history, they are all compatible having originated from old binary stars, with no contribution from young, evolved single stars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicHistorical and Architectural StudiesFrench-language works237,207