MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411687894 · doi:10.13169/jglobfaul.12.1.0003

War and national memory: Georgian, Polish, and British perspectives

2025· article· en· W4411687894 on OpenAlexaff
Lily Hamourtziadou, Przemysław Łukasik, Khatuna Chapichadze

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Global Faultlines · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMemory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Canadian institutionsNational Capital Commission
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeorgianNarrativeEthnic groupCultural memoryMythologyNational IdentitiesEssentialismNational identityHistorySociologyGender studiesLiteraturePolitical scienceAnthropologyArtLawLinguisticsClassicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Essentialist understandings of ethnicity and nationhood suggest that ethnic or national identities are set in stone and hence immutable, but we argue that they are continuously developed into existence through past and present narratives, as they are articulated through historical accounts, national myths, and stories of the dead. The most emotionally powerful symbols of historical memory supporting such narratives are war memorials and museums, where the nation’s dead are remembered. We explore the ways in which human war casualties are remembered – and not remembered – through the study of memorials and museums in three different national contexts: in Georgia, in Poland, and in Great Britain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.769
Threshold uncertainty score0.413

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Global FaultlinesSame topicMemory, Trauma, and CommemorationFrench-language works237,207