MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Frequency-Tunable Ris for Beam Split Mitigation in Wideband Thz Massive MIMO Systems

2025· article· en· W4411688511 on OpenAlexaff
Ibrahim Yildirim, Tho Le‐Ngoc

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWidebandTerahertz radiationMIMOBeam (structure)OptoelectronicsPhysicsOpticsElectronic engineeringComputer scienceTelecommunicationsEngineeringBeamforming

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The beam split effect, caused by frequencyindependent phase shifts in conventional hybrid beamforming, poses a significant challenge for wideband THz communication, undermining array gain and system performance. Despite the promise of THz frequencies for ultra-high data rates and abundant spectrum, their wideband nature exacerbates beamforming difficulties, necessitating innovative solutions to address these limitations. This paper introduces a novel frequency-tunable reconfigurable intelligent surface (FRIS) architecture that addresses beam split in angular-based hybrid beamforming THz systems. Drawing inspiration from graphene-based metasurfaces, the proposed FRIS is capable of shaping the propagation paths of different subcarriers independently, thereby ensuring consistent beam alignment over an ultra-wide bandwidth. Our design further leverages a reduced-complexity hybrid beamforming strategy at the transmitter, mitigating the hardware burden typically associated with fully digital solutions. Numerical evaluations reveal that the proposed architecture effectively mitigates beam split and achieves high spectral efficiency, providing a scalable and energy-efficient solution for future wideband THz communication systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207