A Method for Predicting the Remaining Life of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on an Improved Dempster–Shafer Evidence Theory Framework
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are widely used in consumer electronics, electric vehicles, and renewable energy systems, but their performance decays with their lifespan, which poses safety risks. Therefore, it is crucial to develop remaining useful life (RUL) prediction technology. This paper proposes a RUL prediction method for lithium-ion batteries based on an improved Dempster–Shafer (D-S) evidence theory framework, which aims to improve the accuracy and robustness of prediction by integrating the advantages of a wavelet packet decomposition convolutional neural network (WPD-CNN) and an extended Kalman filter (EKF). The results show that the improved D-S theory overcomes the limitations of the classical D-S theory, improves the accuracy and robustness of diagnosis and prediction, and can effectively integrate multi-source information. Experimental verification shows that the fused model is significantly better than a single model in terms of prediction accuracy and robustness, providing an efficient and reliable solution for fault diagnosis and health management of lithium-ion batteries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".