MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411695098 · doi:10.1111/capa.70016

Comment améliorer le télétravail dans le secteur public : leçons de la littérature en administration publique

2025· article· fr· W4411695098 on OpenAlexaff
François Tremblay, Stéphanie Gagnon

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Public Administration · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWork-Family Balance Challenges
Canadian institutionsÉcole Nationale d'Administration Publique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sommaire Le télétravail est une réalité omniprésente dans les organisations publiques, surtout depuis la COVID‐19. Toutefois, comme il s’agit d’une réalité complexe qui affecte à la fois l’employé, le gestionnaire, l’organisation et la société, il est intéressant de s’interroger sur la façon dont on peut améliorer sa mise en œuvre. Cet article poursuit cet objectif en analysant les recommandations pratiques issues d’une revue systématique de la littérature sur le sujet à partir de la revue notoire et détaillée d'Allen et coll. (2015). Le second objectif abordé par cette revue est celui de savoir comment le télétravail est étudié et par conséquent, quel design devrait guider les prochaines recherches et serait utile aux praticiens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Public AdministrationSame topicWork-Family Balance ChallengesFrench-language works237,207