Un silence éloquent. Du désintérêt des surréalistes pour l’art inuit contemporain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dès les années 1920, les surréalistes firent des territoires arctiques une de leurs terres d’élection, nourrissant un attachement sensible au peuple inuit et à sa culture matérielle. Ils trouvèrent dans la pensée chamanique un support remarquable à la réflexion et s’émerveillèrent devant les masques de danse du génie plastique de leurs concepteurs. De la production sculpturale contemporaine cependant, qui se développa au Canada à partir de 1948-1949 et dont ils purent difficilement être ignorants, ils ne dirent rien –ou presque. L’article interroge ce silence, renseignant tout autant sur les valeurs prônées par le surréalisme d’après-guerre, que sur les réserves émises par les ethnologues français sur l’authenticité culturelle des œuvres inuit contemporaines et plus largement sur un climat de « triste exotisme », caractérisé par des allers-retours constants entre désillusion et élans de foi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.029 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".