MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411697967 · doi:10.3390/medicina61071155

Functional Burden and Quality of Life in Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Cross-Sectional Study

2025· article· en· W4411697967 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roxana Maria Sânziana Pavel, Anamaria Lavinia Purza, Delia Mirela Ţiţ, Andrei-Flavius Radu, Diana Carina Iovanovici, Danche Vasileva, Bogdan Uivaraseanu, Gabriela Bungău, Carmen Delia Nistor-Cseppento

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicina · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWOMACOsteoarthritisMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)Physical therapyCross-sectional studyRehabilitationStage (stratigraphy)DiseaseInternal medicinePathologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Objectives: Osteoarthritis, the most common degenerative joint disease, causes pain, decreased mobility, and functional disability, having a significant impact on patients’ quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of hip osteoarthritis (HOA) and knee osteoarthritis (KOA) on physical functioning and quality of life, and to explore how these outcomes vary according to sex, disease stage, and common comorbidities. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between 1 October and 30 December 2024, at the Medical Rehabilitation Department of Avram Iancu Clinical Hospital in Oradea, Romania. A total of 133 adult patients diagnosed with HOA or KOA, based on clinical and radiographic criteria, were included. Functional status was assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), while quality of life was evaluated using the World Health Organization quality of life questionnaire-BREF version (WHOQOL-BREF). The main outcomes were the total scores of these instruments, analyzed in relation to demographic and clinical variables. Results: Based on the clinical staging criteria applied in the study, 23 patients (17.3%) were classified as being in the early stage, 98 (73.7%) in the progressive stage, and 12 (9.0%) in the advanced or end stage of the disease. The mean WOMAC total score was 52.0 ± 7.9 (scale: 0–96), indicating moderate to severe functional impairment. The mean WHOQOL-BREF score was 67.9 ± 13.1 (scale: 0–100), reflecting a moderately reduced quality of life. A moderate, statistically significant inverse correlation was observed between WOMAC and WHOQOL-BREF scores (Spearman’s rho = −0.565, p < 0.001). Patients with knee osteoarthritis reported significantly lower quality of life compared to those without this condition (66.48 ± 12.73 vs. 71.76 ± 13.31, p = 0.006). No statistically significant differences were found in functional, or quality-of-life scores based on sex. Conclusions: Knee osteoarthritis, particularly when combined with hip involvement, is associated with a substantial decline in quality of life and functional capacity. The severity and location of joint involvement appear to be the primary determinants of disability in this patient population, while systemic comorbidities have a less pronounced influence in the rehabilitation setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicinaSame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207