MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411704703 · doi:10.1163/25897616-bja10129

Prendre soin comme geste éthique beauvoirien

2025· article· fr· W4411704703 on OpenAlexaff
Cécile Gagnon, Romane Marcotte

Bibliographic record

VenueSimone de Beauvoir Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophySociologyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé L’article explore les éthiques du care par l’entremise de la pensée de Simone de Beauvoir, souvent critique à l’égard du travail domestique et du soin en raison de leur nature répétitive et aliénante. Toutefois, en croisant l’existentialisme beauvoirien et les éthiques du care , les autrices proposent de revaloriser ces activités en soulignant leur rôle dans la création d’un horizon de sens et d’une temporalité humaine. Le care ne se limite pas à une nécessité biologique, mais devient une pratique existentielle essentielle à l’autonomie et à la reconnaissance mutuelle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.307
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSimone de Beauvoir StudiesSame topicHealth, Medicine and SocietyFrench-language works237,207