MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411712271 · doi:10.1145/3734188

ScriptAR: No-Code Development of Augmented Reality Educational Games

2025· article· en· W4411712271 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Holford, Michaelah Wales, Steven Bednarski, A. A. Bullock, Robin Harrap, Zack MacDonald, T.C. Nicholas Graham

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAugmented Reality Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityRegional Municipality of WaterlooUniversity of WaterlooQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAugmented realityComputer scienceCode (set theory)Human–computer interactionMathematics educationPsychologyProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are significant barriers to the real-world adoption of educational games, including failing to match local curriculum, learning objectives, cultural norms, or student abilities. Ideally, teachers should be able to customize educational games for their classroom, but modification tools are too difficult and time-consuming to use, or not present at all. To address this problem, we present ScriptAR , a no-code tool that helps in the creation and modification of short educational stories without the need to program. ScriptAR supports easy transition from a narrative idea to the technical realization of a game using a simple spreadsheet interface. Feedback from ten teacher candidates and six elementary school students indicate that ScriptAR allows people with little technical background to rapidly develop augmented reality educational games that can be tailored to local curriculum and classroom environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.480
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionSame topicAugmented Reality ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207