MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411715122 · doi:10.1101/2025.06.21.660875

Insulin Prevents Fat Loss and Promotes Muscle Loss During Intermittent Fasting in Obesity

2025· preprint· en· W4411715122 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel M. Marko, Meghan O. Conn, Joseph F. Cavallari, Helena Neudorf, Alexandra P. Steele, Brittany M. Duggan, Breanne T McAlpin, Nicole G. Barra, Thomas J. Hawke, Jonathan P. Little, Jonathan D. Schertzer

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDietary Effects on Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeight lossEndocrinologyInternal medicineIntermittent fastingObesityMedicineInsulin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Elevated blood glucose, insulin, and insulin resistance are associated with obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D). High blood insulin levels blunt lipolysis and promote lipogenesis, and thus weight gain. Intermittent fasting (IF) has emerged as a weight loss strategy that also lowers blood glucose and improves insulin resistance. However, some people with obesity, or T2D have less fat loss and more lean mass loss after IF. It is not known why some people lose more fat or muscle during IF. We hypothesized that features of obesity, such as high insulin and insulin action in adipocytes dictate less adipose loss and more muscle loss during IF. In humans, we found that people living with obesity and higher blood insulin lost more lean mass after a 48-hour fast. Chronic elevation of insulin in obese mice lowered adipose loss and promoted muscle loss after 10 weeks of 5:2 IF in obese mice, while concurrently lowering adipose tissue interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) expression. Whole-body and adipocyte-specific deletion of Irf4 in mice phenocopied chronic hyperinsulinemia, resulting in less fat loss and greater muscle loss after 10 weeks of 5:2 IF, which occurred in mouse models of equal and reduced caloric intake during IF. Therefore, hyperinsulinemia and suppression of adipocyte IRF4 promote muscle loss over fat loss during IF. Significance Statement It is not known why some people lose muscle during IF. In humans, we found that high blood insulin during obesity correlated with increased lean mass loss after one 48-hour fast. Mechanistically, we found that hyperinsulinemia and the insulin responsive factor IRF4 within adipocytes as regulators of adipose and muscle loss during chronic IF obese mice. Therefore, insulin status and regulation of adipocyte IRF4 may be important factors to consider before prescribing IF for weight loss as lower muscle mass is known to be detrimental to metabolic and overall health status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicDietary Effects on HealthFrench-language works237,207