Rapid post-release adaptation of released orphan elephants from a rescue centre to a national park in Sri Lanka based on faecal glucocorticoid metabolite analyses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Rewilding and species reintroductions are increasingly important conservation strategies, involving both captive-bred and wild-rescued animals, with the goal of restoring ecosystems and supporting populations of threatened species. Over the past 30 years, the Elephant Transit Home in Sri Lanka has rescued and rehabilitated more than 150 orphaned elephant calves that were subsequently released back into the wild. Understanding how rehabilitation and release processes affect the welfare status of these calves can provide valuable information on factors affecting release outcomes. This study evaluated patterns of faecal glucocorticoid metabolite (fGCM) concentrations as a physiological indicator of stress in 10 orphaned elephants (six males, four females) rescued at ≤1 year of age and released back into Udawalawe National Park after rehabilitation at the Elephant Transit Home (release age, 6 to 8 years). Faecal samples (~2/week) were collected for 9 months pre- (n = 53 samples) and 16 months post- (n = 153 samples) release. Mean fGCM concentrations during the early post-release period (first 17 days) were significantly higher than in pre- and later post-release periods, with no differences between males and females. Results indicate elephants adapted quickly after release, likely aided by being released in a small group (n = 10) of socialized cohorts. In fact, fGCM normalized to concentrations lower on average than at the Elephant Transit Home in the months preceding release. Understanding the stress response of elephants during and after translocations is crucial for well-being and successful integration into the wild. Minimizing stress through appropriate protocols, such as selecting strong social units, is essential. Hormonal monitoring is a valuable tool that should be considered long-term to assess the adaptation, survival and eventual reproductive success of rewilded elephants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".