MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411722374 · doi:10.70251/hyjr2348.33163166

Combating Vaccine Hesitancy in the Philippines: Bridging the Gap Through Visual Communication and Education

2025· article· en· W4411722374 on OpenAlexaff
Stella Brothers

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican journal of student research. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Canadian institutionsFields Institute for Research in Mathematical Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridging (networking)PsychologyPolitical scienceComputer scienceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, data has shown a growth in vaccine hesitancy for families in the Philippines, specifically in regards to the Dengue and COVID-19 immunizations for children. While vaccines remain widely available, strained health systems, poverty, lack of resources, and limited access to health education and functional literacy hinder under-resourced families from understanding and trusting essential childhood vaccinations. In low-income countries where there is a high percentage of people with low literacy rates, visual aids in health education have been proven beneficial by improving health communication and decision-making. This paper examines the roots of vaccine hesitancy in the Philippines, highlighting educational shortcomings, misinformation, and cultural perceptions, and how this can be improved with the use of visual aids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.805

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.478
Teacher spread0.396 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican journal of student research.Same topicVaccine Coverage and HesitancyFrench-language works237,207