MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411726174 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2025.3583924

Generative AI-Empowered Resilient Adaptive ISAC Against Adversarial Machine Learning Attacks

2025· article· en· W4411726174 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdversarial systemComputer scienceGenerative grammarArtificial intelligenceAdversarial machine learningMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a novel resilient adaptive integrated sensing and communication (RAd-ISAC) framework. It aims to enhance ISAC systems for advanced driver-assistance systems (ADASs) to mitigate adversarial machine learning (AML) threats and improve resource efficiency. AML attacks target ADASs by injecting false Range-Doppler maps (RDMs) to mislead the system about target vehicles (TVs), resulting in resource inefficiency. Our approach introduces a generative adversarial network (GAN) equipped with a differentiable Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) loss function, termed KSGAN. This significantly enhances AML attack detection by generating highly realistic RDM samples, improving the robustness of the AML detector. To optimize resource allocation in ISAC systems, we propose an adaptive signal transmission method. This allows the source vehicle (SV) to switch dynamically between ISAC and communication-only signals based on the AML detector's output and 2D constant false alarm rate (CFAR) analyses. We conduct extensive simulations with synthetic data using IBM's adversarial robustness toolbox (ART). Our results show that KSGAN outperforms standard GAN, Wasserstein GAN (WGAN), and relational GAN (RGAN) in AML detection. Additionally, when compared to other ISAC designs, including standalone ISAC, Faster-than-Nyquist ISAC (FTN-ISAC), ISAC-accelerated edge intelligence system, and hybrid-ISAC, our Rad-ISAC framework achieves the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) and Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB). This work highlights an unexplored vulnerability of ISAC systems to AML attacks and demonstrates advancements in ADAS vehicle safety and efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it