MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411728405 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-2025-2702

Satellite telemetry of surface ablation observations to inform spatial melt modelling, Place Glacier, British Columbia, Canada

2025· preprint· en· W4411728405 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Alexandre Bevington, Brian Menounos, M Ednie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaNatural Resources CanadaGovernment of British ColumbiaUniversity of Northern British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTula Foundation
KeywordsGlacierTelemetrySatelliteRemote sensingAblation zoneGeologyGeodesySatellite imageryGeographyPhysical geographyMeteorologyTelecommunicationsComputer scienceAerospace engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Four automated "smart stakes" equipped with ultrasonic sensors, Arduino microcontrollers, and Iridium satellite telemetry were deployed to monitor glacier surface elevation changes at Place Glacier, British Columbia, Canada during the 2024 ablation season. The smart stakes recorded air temperature, relative humidity, and distance to glacier surface every 15 minutes from May 14 to September 21, 2024, providing high-temporal resolution melt data across an elevation gradient. Integration with airborne lidar surveys and satellite snow cover observations enabled validation and spatial extrapolation of point measurements. Temperature-index modeling using smart stake data yielded ice melt factors of -4.26 to -5.63 mm w.e. °C⁻¹ d⁻¹ and snow melt factors of -3.74 to -4.42 mm w.e. °C⁻¹ d⁻¹, consistent with previous studies. The spatial melt model estimated a total seasonal melt volume of 11.61 × 10⁶ m³ water equivalent, representing a summer mass balance of -4.14 m w.e. for the glacier. Validation against manual ablation stakes showed reasonable agreement (R² = 0.58, RMSE = 0.45 m w.e.). Event-scale analysis revealed that three discrete heat events (July 5–22, August 1–12, and August 29–September 9) accounted for over half of the total seasonal melt despite comprising only one-third of the ablation season. Maximum daily melt rates reached -87 mm w.e. d⁻¹ during these extreme events, with higher elevation sites experiencing disproportionately greater melt rates. Non-linear temperature lapse rates were observed across the glacier, highlighting the importance of distributed temperature measurements for accurate melt modeling. The low-cost smart stake system demonstrates significant potential for automated glacier monitoring, providing near real-time data transmission and enabling event-scale melt attribution studies. This multi-scale monitoring approach combining in-situ sensors, airborne lidar, and satellite observations offers a comprehensive framework for understanding glacier melt dynamics in a changing climate, though challenges remain regarding sensor stability, power management, and accounting for glacier dynamics in melt estimates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→