MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411729311 · doi:10.1101/2025.06.24.660289

Agropyron cristatum genome provides a new insight for wheat improvement with wild relatives

2025· preprint· en· W4411729311 on OpenAlexaff
Shenghui Zhou, Wenjing Yang, Haiming Han, Peng Zhou, Baojin Guo, Jinpeng Zhang, Bing Han, Xuezhong Liang, Yida Lin, Yuan Deng, Bin Liu, Xinming Yang, Yuqing Lu, Jisen Zhang, Ping Yang, Keke Yi, Yunbi Xu, Zhiyong Liu, Nils Stein, Qiang He, Hong‐Qing Ling, Lihui Li

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Genetics
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAgropyron cristatumAgropyronGenomeBiologyGeneticsEvolutionary biologyAgronomyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exploring novel genetic variation for target traits is crucial for advancing wheat breeding and genetic improvement. Since 1990, we have been transferring genes from Agropyron cristatum, a promising wild relative genetic resource featuring robust spike morphology and stress tolerance, into common wheat by distant hybridization. To efficiently harness A. cristatum genes, we de novo assembled a 25.62-Gb high-quality genome of an autotetraploid accession Z559 with 28 chromosomes, and uncovered its specific genome features and an extensive repertoire of genes associated with yield and resistance to abiotic and biotic stresses. We systematically characterized A. cristatum genome introgressions by resequencing 431 wheat-A. cristatum derivatives and cloned the gene AcGNS1, which functions in the regulation of grain number per spike in wheat. Subsequently, we developed an optimized genome-selection model for wheat-A. cristatum breeding derivatives, enabling the rapid selection of new potential varieties. These findings demonstrate a genomic breeding strategy for leveraging novel genetic resources of wild relatives and advancing wheat improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology→French-language works237,207→