MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411731341 · doi:10.3389/frai.2025.1601815

A nnU-Net-based automatic segmentation of FCD type II lesions in 3D FLAIR MRI images

2025· article· en· W4411731341 on OpenAlexaff
Shubham Joshi, Millie Pant, Kusum Deep, Vaclav Snasel

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Artificial Intelligence · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSegmentationFluid-attenuated inversion recoveryComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkCortical dysplasiaArtificial intelligenceDeep learningEpilepsyPreprocessorVoxelPattern recognition (psychology)LesionMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingRadiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) type II is a common cause of epilepsy and is challenging to detect due to its similarities with other brain conditions. Finding these lesions accurately is essential for successful surgery and seizure control. Manual detection is slow and challenging because the MRI features are subtle. Deep learning, especially convolutional neural networks, has shown great potential in automating image classification and segmentation by learning and extracting features. The nnU-Net framework is known for its ability to adapt its settings, including preprocessing, network design, training, and post-processing, to any new medical imaging task. This study employs an automated slice selection approach that ranks axial FLAIR slices by their peak voxel intensity and retains the five highest-ranked slices per scan, thereby focusing the network on lesion-rich slices and uses nnU-Net to automate the segmentation of FCD type II lesions on 3D FLAIR MRI images. The study was conducted on 85 FCD type II subjects and results are evaluated through 5-fold cross-validation. Using nnU-Net's flexible and robust design, this study aims to improve the accuracy and speed of lesion detection, helping with better presurgical evaluations and outcomes for epilepsy patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score0.631

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Artificial IntelligenceSame topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207