MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411732624 · doi:10.1093/bjd/ljaf085.132

P104 Lebrikizumab improves quality of life in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis inadequately controlled or ineligible for ciclosporin (ADvantage study)

2025· article· en· W4411732624 on OpenAlexaff
Richard B. Warren, Marjolein de Bruin‐Weller, Athanasios Tsianakas, A. Khemis, Jacek C. Szepietowski, Hwanhee Hong, J. Valls, Víctor Sapena, Helena Agell, Èric Massana, Esther García Gil, Stephan Weidinger

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Dermatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCiclosporinAtopic dermatitisMedicineDermatologyQuality of life (healthcare)PediatricsSurgeryTransplantation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ciclosporin A (CsA) is indicated for the treatment of severe atopic dermatitis (AD), but its efficacy may not be optimal and its safety limits longer-term use. Lebrikizumab (LEB) is a high-affinity anti-interleukin-13 monoclonal antibody. In the ADvantage study (NCT05149313), LEB was dosed 250 mg every 2 weeks and administered with topical corticosteroids (TCS). At week 16 this regimen had significantly improved signs and symptoms of AD in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD inadequately controlled or ineligible for CsA, with an acceptable safety profile. The objective of this study was to assess the quality of life (QoL) at week 16 of patients with moderate-to-severe AD inadequately controlled with or ineligible for CsA. ADvantage is a 52-week study with a 16-week placebo (PBO)-controlled induction period plus a 36-week open-label maintenance period with LEB dosed every 2 weeks. Eligible patients were adults and adolescents (≥ 12 to < 18 years) with Eczema Area and Severity Index ≥ 16, Investigator’s Global Assessment ≥ 3, and ≥ 10% body surface area of AD involvement, not adequately controlled with or ineligible for CsA. Patients received concomitant low-to-mid-potency topical corticosteroids (TCS) through week 16. QoL was assessed by Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Here we report different endpoints: the percentage change from baseline (CFB), the percentage of patients achieving DLQI ≤ 5 and the percentage of patients achieving DLQI of 0 or 1 (0/1). Missing data due to lack of efficacy or data after rescue medication usage (high-potency TCS or systemic treatment) were imputed using nonresponder imputation. Other missing data were imputed using multiple imputation. Descriptive analyses of percentage CFB in DLQI were performed by mixed models for repeated measures. In total, 331 patients were randomized (220 LEB+TCS and 111 PBO+TCS) and 212 and 100, respectively, completed the 16-week period. The treatment groups had similar baseline characteristics. A greater percentage CFB in DLQI was obtained with LEB)TCS than PBO+TCS (−59.9% vs. −37.3%, P < 0.01) at week 16. Moreover, a higher percentage of patients on LEB+TCS achieved DLQI ≤ 5 (55.7% LEB+TCS vs. 34.7% PBO+TCS, P < 0.05) and DLQI 0/1 (30.6% LEB+TCS vs. 8.3% PBO+TCS, P < 0.001) at week 16, compared with PBO+TCS. LEB dosed every 2 weeks with TCS showed improvements in the QoL of adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD inadequately controlled with or ineligible for CsA. A relevant number of patients reported no or minimal impact on their QoL after 16 weeks of treatment. Almirall, S.A. has licensed the rights to develop and commercialize lebrikizumab for the treatment of dermatology indications, including AD, in Europe. Lilly has exclusive rights for the development and commercialization of lebrikizumab in the USA and the rest of the world outside of Europe. Medical writing was funded by Almirall S.A.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of DermatologySame topicDermatology and Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207