MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411737225 · doi:10.1007/s11357-025-01702-w

Deep learning predicts onset acceleration of 38 age-associated diseases from blood and body composition biomarkers in the UK Biobank

2025· article· en· W4411737225 on OpenAlex
Mica Xu Ji, Marjola Thanaj, Léna Nehale-Ezzine, Brandon Whitcher, E. Louise Thomas, Jimmy D. Bell

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeroScience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Disease Management Strategies
Canadian institutionsMila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute
FundersCalico Life Sciences
KeywordsAlgorithmConcordance correlation coefficientArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A major challenge in multimorbid aging is understanding how diseases co-occur and identifying high-risk groups for accelerated disease development, but to date associations in the relative onset acceleration of disease diagnoses have not been used to characterize disease patterns. This study presents the development and evaluation of a neural network Cox model for predicting onset acceleration risk for age-associated conditions, using demographic, anthropomorphic, imaging, and blood biomarker traits from 60,396 individuals and 218,530 outcome events from the UK Biobank. Risk prediction was evaluated with Harrell’s concordance index (C-index). The model performed well on internal (C-index $$0.6830 \pm 0.0902$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0.6830</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.0902</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , $$n=8,931$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>8</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>931</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) and external (C-index $$0.6461 \pm 0.1264$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0.6461</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.1264</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , $$n=855$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>855</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) test sets, attaining C-index $$\ge 0.6$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>≥</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.6</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> on 38 out of 47 ( $$80.9\%$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>80.9</mml:mn> <mml:mo>%</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) conditions. Inclusion of body composition and blood biomarker input traits was independently important for predictive performance. Kaplan-Meier curves for predicted risk quartiles (log-rank $$p \le 1.16E-16$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≤</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1.16</mml:mn> <mml:mi>E</mml:mi> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>16</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) indicated robust stratification of individuals into high and low risk groups. Analysis of risk quartiles revealed cardiometabolic, vascular-neuropsychiatric, and digestive-neuropsychiatric disease clusters with strong statistically significant inter-correlated onset acceleration ( $$r \ge 0.6$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≥</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.6</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , $$p \le 3.46E-5$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≤</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3.46</mml:mn> <mml:mi>E</mml:mi> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ), while 13 and 19 conditions were strongly associated with onset acceleration of all-cause mortality and all-cause morbidity, respectively. In prognostic survival analysis, the proportional hazards assumption was met (Schoenfeld residual $$p &gt; 0.05$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) in 435 out of 435 or 100% (1238 out of 1334 or 92.8%) of cases across outcomes, $$aHR= 6.11 \pm 9.00$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>a</mml:mi> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>6.11</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>9.00</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ( $$aHR = 3.67 \pm 5.78$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>a</mml:mi> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3.67</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>5.78</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) with (without) Bonferroni correction. The neural architecture of OnsetNet was interpreted with saliency analysis, and several significant body composition and blood biomarkers were identified. The results demonstrate that neural network survival models are able to estimate prognostically informative onset acceleration risk, which could be used to improve understanding of synchronicity in the onset of age-associated diseases and reprioritize patients based on disease-specif

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it